Files
redefined-designs/backend
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5 6f3e77fa88 feat(intake): report what a whole-item background removal actually did (#293)
removeBackgroundsForItem answered void and threw on the first failure, which is enough for the drafting worker — it catches and logs, and a draft is not worth failing over — and not enough for an admin standing in front of a screen who needs to know whether the thing they pressed happened. It now returns a summary: how many photos the item has, how many carry a cut-out, and whether it stopped early.

It still stops at the first failure. Six attempts against a sidecar that is not answering helps nobody, and stopping costs nothing because removeImageBackground skips a photo that already has an original recorded, so a retry resumes rather than starting over. The count is what turns that retry into an informed choice instead of a guess.

Adds restoreOriginalsForItem alongside it. A photo that was never cut out is skipped rather than refused, because the mixed state a partial removal leaves behind is exactly when somebody reaches for this.

The one existing caller does not change: the worker ignores the result, and ignoring a returned value is legal, which is what makes this additive rather than breaking.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 10:16:04 -05:00
..