Files
redefined-designs/docs
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5 12e1616392 docs(db): design converting the two dynamic queries to Kysely (#308)
The work #305 made possible and deliberately did not do. These are the two queries the builder was ever wanted for: admin.ts and items.ts both splice a run-time-composed where clause into query text, and they are the only places S2077 has a real point after #294 hoisted the seven fixed-shape queries into named constants. They are safe today, and itemFilters.ts spells out why in sixteen lines — which is the problem, because a property that takes sixteen lines to explain is one an edit can quietly break.

All four call sites convert rather than only the two flagged ones. The by-id constants carry no hotspot and are already safe, but they are built by interpolating the same projection strings the list queries use, so converting only the list queries would leave itemSelect.ts holding a Kysely builder and a raw string that must produce an identical projection — two spellings to keep in step by hand where the file's own header already warns about one.

The filter builder returns an array of expressions rather than taking a query builder and returning it filtered, because the two callers do different things with the result: the storefront prepends its own not-pending clause and the admin route does not. A function that owned the builder would have to be told about that difference. startIndex disappears with the splicing it existed for.

The aggregate subqueries become jsonArrayFrom, which emits the same coalesce(json_agg(agg), '[]') they hand-write today. That is the second thing this buys and it may matter more than the first: pool.query<T> asserts a shape TypeScript never checks against the SQL, which is why itemSelect.ts's header says the selects and their types are kept in step by hand and the integration suite is the only thing that catches a drop. Afterwards that is a compile error.

The row types stay hand-written and exported rather than being inferred from the query. Inference would be tidier and is refused on purpose: these are the shape the frontend reads, and a type that silently becomes whatever the query happens to return is a contract that can change without anyone deciding to.

The two invariant tests survive and get stronger. They currently inspect the clause strings the function returns; afterwards they compile the expressions and assert on the SQL Kysely actually emits, with the hostile value appearing in the parameters and nowhere else — the same claim tested against the real artefact instead of an intermediate one.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 16:42:52 -05:00
..