Adds a checkbox to the public submission page that lets a sender opt out of background removal, ticked by default because most items look better cut out and the reverse default would mean almost nobody got it. It only renders when the server reports the sidecar is configured, matching the intake link's new backgroundRemoval flag from Task 5 — an unconfigured environment gets no checkbox rather than one that would do nothing.
submitItem now takes removeBackground as a required fourth parameter, sent as the multipart string 'true' or 'false' to match the backend's exact-string opt-out contract. Making the parameter required rather than optional was deliberate, so the compiler would catch any call site left unupdated; the frontend build (which also type-checks tests/ via tsconfig.test.json) confirmed the only call site, in Submit.tsx, was updated.
scripts/start-local.ps1 now sets REMBG_URL for the local backend so the checkbox is visible during local and e2e runs; the value need not resolve, since no e2e submission reaches the sidecar without a configured drafting step.
Adds two e2e cases to intake-submit.spec.ts: the checkbox appears ticked by default, and a sender can uncheck it and still submit successfully. Both are written per the task-7 brief but not run in this session, since running Playwright requires the full local stack (database, backend, frontend dev server) which was not started.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adding e2e specs for the submission page found a defect in the page they were written for, which is what they were for.
One limiter counted page loads and submissions against the same twenty-per-quarter-hour allowance, so a sender working through a box of stock ran out after ten items — the exact person the feature exists for, and the exact case the limiter's own comment said must not be refused. The comment said refusing them costs a consignment while the number quietly did it.
Worse, the page could not tell a 429 from a 404. `fetchIntakeLink` treated any non-OK response as "no link", so a throttled sender was told "This link is not active" and sent to ask for a replacement — which could not have helped, because the problem was their address and a minute of patience. Two conditions needing opposite reactions were sharing a message.
Now two limiters, because the two requests cost different things. Reading a link hits one indexed row and writes nothing, so that allowance is generous at 120: someone re-reading the form or losing their signal should never be told to wait. Submitting writes up to six files, so that is the one worth bounding, at 30 — more than anyone photographing items can manage and far less than a script would want.
The page gains a third state. Unknown, revoked and used-up still collapse into one "not active" card, because whether a link exists is not something a stranger needs to learn. Throttled is deliberately kept apart from them, since "wait a moment" and "go and ask for another link" are opposite instructions.
Measured rather than assumed, on a freshly started process both times: before, 25 page loads produced 14 rejections; after, 40 produce none. The first attempt at that measurement was wrong and worth recording — the restart had failed with EADDRINUSE, so it read 30 of 30 against the old process's already-exhausted store.
The two specs now pass in a full parallel run alongside everything else. They are scoped the way #241 asks: unique run ids, assertions naming only this run's rows, nothing asserted about the table as a whole.
Backend: 284 integration, 309 unit. Frontend: build clean, lint unchanged at 2 pre-existing warnings.
Ref #222, #241
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5