Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5 0dd4ac36ff fix(mail): bound the transporter's timeouts, and fix a now-stale comment (#260)
adminUploadLinks.ts awaits sendMail on the admin's request path, the first awaited send on a user-facing request in this codebase, but the transporter in mailer.ts set no connectionTimeout, greetingTimeout or socketTimeout. nodemailer's defaults then apply: two minutes to connect, ten minutes on the socket. If the SMTP host is unreachable in a way that drops packets rather than refusing, the link row and its token are already committed by the time sendMail is called, the response hangs for up to two minutes, the browser or reverse proxy gives up first, and the token — shown exactly once and unrecoverable — is never rendered. That is the link being lost in exactly the way this feature's central invariant forbids.

All three timeouts are now set to 5000ms, with a comment explaining why a send on a request path has to fail fast rather than inherit nodemailer's fire-and-forget defaults. Five seconds is generous for a reachable host and short enough that a dead one fails while the admin is still willing to wait, leaving them the "not emailed" warning and a link they can still copy instead of a stuck spinner and a token nobody ever saw.

Also corrects the comment directly above the skipped-blocked return, which said "returning as though it sent" — true before #260, and precisely backwards now that the outcome is reported through MailOutcome rather than swallowed. Reworded to describe what the code actually does today, keeping the explanation of why it skips rather than throws.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-03 18:30:49 -05:00
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5 8a35c213fc feat(mail): have sendMail say what it actually did (#260)
It returned Promise<void> and returned early in two cases that were indistinguishable from success at the call site: no SMTP credentials, and a recipient outside MAIL_ALLOWLIST. A caller could therefore report that it had emailed somebody a message nobody would ever receive, and in QA — which restricts delivery deliberately, as its entire safety property — that is the normal case rather than an edge one.

It now returns a MailOutcome saying which of the three happened. No existing caller changes: there are seven and every one ignores the result, so this is additive. Re-deriving the answer at a second site would have duplicated isAllowedRecipient and the SMTP check, which is exactly the drift the guard-in-one-place comment above them exists to prevent.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-03 17:39:59 -05:00
bermudalamb f32913ef51 refactor: turn on noUncheckedIndexedAccess in both workspaces (#101)
Linting / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m57s
SonarQube Analysis / sonarqube (pull_request) Failing after 5m3s
Indexing an array now yields `T | undefined`, which is what it always did — the compiler simply says so. Enabled in backend/tsconfig.json and frontend/tsconfig.json, and in tsconfig.sonar.json alongside it so the drift guard stays satisfied.

The sequencing this issue insisted on was right, and the numbers show why. Before #159 typed the query results, `rows[0]` was `any` and `any` indexes to `any`: the flag would have found close to nothing and the count would have changed completely afterwards. With the rows typed it finds 57 — 50 in the backend, 4 in the frontend, 3 in the Playwright suite — and they fall into three kinds.

Thirty are `rows[0]` after a `rows.length` guard. TypeScript cannot connect the two, and rewriting them as `const [row] = rows; if (!row) …` makes the guard and the use the same check, which is better code independently of the flag.

Ten are rows a statement guarantees — `INSERT … RETURNING`, or a lookup for an id the session middleware has already matched. These get `requireRow(rows, what)`, a new helper in db.ts that throws naming the query. A thrown error rather than a non-null assertion: if the assumption is ever wrong, an assertion hands `undefined` to the next line and fails somewhere unrelated, whereas this fails at the query and says which. asyncRoute turns it into a 500, which is the right answer for "the database did not do what the statement says it does". It also states the assumption once instead of ten times.

The rest is ordinary indexing the compiler cannot prove: a regex capture group that the pattern guarantees, `split('+')[0]`, a modulo kept in range, `hasOwnProperty` failing to narrow an index signature, and Express typing route params as an index signature so `req.params.itemId` is `string | undefined` on a route that cannot match without it.

One correction to this issue's premise, which matters for what it was expected to find. The body says "in a handful it does not guard at all", and the unguarded-500 risk it describes was not found. Every `rows[0]` either sits behind a length check or behind a statement that guarantees a row. What the flag actually bought was the ten places where that guarantee was real but unstated, and those now say so.

Two changes worth calling out because they are not mechanical. TAG_COLORS is typed `[string, ...string[]]` in both copies rather than `as const` — the first attempt used `as const`, which narrowed the elements to literals and broke adminTags, so the annotation keeps `string` while telling the compiler index 0 exists. And the filter drawer's slider falls back to the bounds it was given rather than to null, because null there reads as "no filter" and would widen the results rather than leave them unchanged.

Test files needed changes too, since ts-jest compiles them against the same config: a regex destructure in the compose guard, and ten `mock.calls[0][0]` reads where the surrounding assertions already establish the call happened.

Verified: tsc clean over backend, frontend src and the Playwright suite; unit 254/254; integration 238/238; frontend build clean; lint unchanged in both workspaces.

Closes #101
2026-08-24 15:25:09 -05:00
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5 0c90e18205 feat: let QA send real email, guarded by a recipient allowlist (#87)
SonarQube Analysis / sonarqube (pull_request) Failing after 13m54s
Tests / lint (pull_request) Successful in 4m27s
Tests / backend-unit (pull_request) Successful in 1m23s
Tests / frontend-e2e (pull_request) Failing after 24m46s
QA has never been able to send mail. The compose file set no SMTP variables and the mailer skips sending when it finds none, which was deliberate — a QA run must not be able to email a real customer if a fixture ever holds a real address. The cost is that four customer-facing flows have never been exercised anywhere but production: verification, password reset, favorite-sold alerts, and the cart-reminder cron that already has a known silent failure mode.

MAIL_ALLOWLIST replaces the blanket mute. Unset means unrestricted, which is production and must stay so. Set means only matching recipients are delivered to; anything else is skipped with a [mail-blocked] warning naming the address and subject. An entry is either a full address, which also covers its plus-suffixed variants, or @domain for every mailbox there — plus-addressing is how these tests get written, and nobody should have to edit an allowlist to invent a new suffix mid-run.

The guard sits in the mailer, not at the four call sites, so every sender is covered by construction and a fifth added later cannot bypass it by forgetting. It skips rather than throws: three callers already swallow send failures into a log, so throwing would mostly be caught anyway while risking a 500 on the signup path. The flow under test finishes and the log says why no mail arrived, which is exactly what was missing when QA was simply muted.

Two details are load-bearing enough to state. Comparison is exact equality on both halves of the address rather than a suffix test, so a lookalike domain ending in an allowed one cannot get through — there is a test for that specifically. And a present-but-empty value refuses everyone rather than allowing everyone: writing MAIL_ALLOWLIST= expresses an intent to restrict, and reading it as "no restriction" would turn a typo into an outbound mail incident.

This inverts the failure mode, so the allowlist is hardcoded in docker-compose.qa.yml rather than read from a stack variable. The safety property must not depend on remembering to set something in Portainer, where an omission would mean unrestricted sending from an environment full of fixtures. The comment says removing the line disables the restriction rather than the mail.

QA points at Brevo, reusing the existing account rather than a separate QA sender — a deliberate choice that puts QA volume behind production's sending reputation and quota, acceptable for now. Host, port and secure are pinned in the compose because the mailer's fallbacks are Gmail's and Brevo needs 587 with STARTTLS; that mismatch fails at send time rather than at boot, which is #64's territory.

Verified: 12 new unit tests on the matching function, which is where a mistake would actually be dangerous — 98 unit and 144 integration passing, lint 0 errors and 8 warnings unchanged, and the compose renders the expected values under docker compose config.

Refs #87
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-21 09:15:30 -05:00
bermudalamb 9be4986dd3 Initial commit: redefined-designs storefront 2026-08-13 21:07:54 +00:00