Commit Graph
11 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5 b8549e9c72 feat: let a customer resend their own verification email (#110)
A verification email was sent once, at registration. If it was lost, filtered, or arrived after the 24-hour token had expired, the customer had no route back except registering again with a different address.

POST /api/customers/resend-verification mints a fresh token and sends the mail, and the account page grows a "Send it again" button beside the warning that was already there. The button only exists while the address is unverified: on a verified account it would be a control whose only outcome is a refusal, and the endpoint refuses that case rather than sending a pointless email.

The mint-token-and-send sequence now lives in one place. Registration and the email change already did the same three steps - supersede any outstanding token, mint a new one, send it - and this would have been a third copy. The step most likely to be dropped in a copy is the supersede, and it is the one that matters: without it an older message still sitting in the inbox goes on verifying.

Anything that makes the server send mail on request is an abuse vector, so this is rate limited to three an hour, keyed on the customer id. That is tighter than either existing limiter and sidesteps #84's IPv6 problem entirely, since a signed-in caller has an identity better than an address to count against and cannot escape the bucket by moving within a delegated prefix. The refusal says the mail probably did send and to check the spam folder, which is both more useful and more honest than a bare 429.

The claim that keying on customer id also solved test isolation was wrong, and the tests caught it. resetDb truncates with RESTART IDENTITY, so every integration test's first customer is id 1: three tests that each sent once left the fourth starting at its limit, and two tests failed on a 429 they never asked for. A "fresh customer per test" is a fresh row with a recycled identity. The limiter now has an explicit exported store the suite clears between tests, and the comment that claimed otherwise has been corrected rather than left to mislead the next reader.

Verification: seven integration tests covering the unauthenticated refusal, the send, the new token invalidating the old one - asserted through the endpoint that would honour the stale link rather than by counting rows - the new link actually verifying, the already-verified refusal, the allowance stopping the fourth send rather than merely reporting it, and one customer's exhausted allowance leaving another's intact. Three end-to-end tests for the button, its confirmation and the message on the fourth click. The 33 integration tests across the three suites this touched all pass, as do the 199 backend unit tests. tsc clean on both sides, ESLint no errors.

Closes #110
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-22 12:59:09 -05:00
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5 7c3463650d feat(backend): let a customer change their own name, password and email (#111)
SonarQube Analysis / sonarqube (pull_request) Failing after 12m11s
Two of the three already existed on the backend and had no caller. PUT /api/customers/me updated the name; POST /api/customers/change-password already demanded the current password and enforced the eight-character minimum. Neither was reachable from the frontend, which is why the gap was easy to miss — the API looked finished.

The name endpoint accepted empty values and wrote nulls, letting a customer clear fields registration refuses to let them skip. That is the same rule disagreeing with itself, so it now refuses each by name exactly as registration does.

Changing a password now ends other sessions and keeps the one making the change. Reset already deleted every session for the customer, on the reasoning that a password is changed precisely when the old one may be known to someone else — change reached the opposite conclusion for no recorded reason, and a session opened with a leaked password outlived the change meant to lock it out. The current session is spared so the change does not eject the person making it.

Changing the email address is new. It asks for the current password, because swapping the address a password reset goes to is how an account is taken over and a live session alone is not enough; that also matches what change-password already required. The address is normalised and validated, an address another account holds is refused with the same 409 as registration, and on success the row is marked unverified and any outstanding verification token superseded — one already sitting in the old inbox must not be able to verify the new address.

Two emails then go out, to different places. Verification to the new address, and a notice to the old one naming what the address was changed to. The notice is the only thing that tells a real owner their account was taken, and one that does not say where the address went is nearly useless to someone checking whether it was them. Both sends happen after the row is written, never before, so a change that failed cannot produce mail saying it succeeded.

That notice is a sixth template in #92's system, which cost a definition and a default body. The unit tests iterate every template, so its defaults were checked against its own required placeholder without writing a new test.

Verified: 199 unit and 208 integration passing. The session test signs in on a second agent, changes the password on the first, and asserts the second is refused while the first still works — the property being claimed rather than the code path being executed. One of my own assertions was wrong on the way: /me answers an unauthenticated caller with 401 and an error body, not an empty one, and the frontend is what turns that into null.

Refs #111
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-22 09:00:46 -05:00
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5 4ed9513ad2 feat(backend): make the five customer emails editable copy (#92)
Every customer email was a template literal in the route that sent it, so changing a word meant a code change, a review and a deploy. All five now render from markdown that an admin can edit: verification, password reset, favorite sold, favorite withdrawn, and the cart reminder. Five, not the four the issue counted — the favorite alerts have separate copy for sold and withdrawn.

markdown-it runs with html disabled, which is its default and the reason for choosing it over marked. Raw HTML in a stored body is escaped rather than passed through, so editing copy cannot put script into a customer's inbox. That is a stronger guarantee than sanitising output, because there is no output to sanitise.

Values are substituted into the markdown before it renders, which means a value that should become a list has to arrive as markdown. The cart reminder previously built li elements by hand; those would now be escaped and shown to the customer as literal angle brackets, so it emits a markdown list instead. The greeting is one placeholder rather than a bare name, so a template author writes {{greeting}} instead of "Hi {{firstName}}," — which reads as "Hi ," for anyone who registered before first names were required.

Saving is refused when a body has dropped a placeholder it needs, naming all of them rather than the first. This is the rule that separates a convenience from a way to break password resets from a settings screen: a reset email with no link still sends, still looks correct in the log, and is useless to everyone who receives it.

The favorite alerts' consent sentence is appended by the server and is not editable. It explains why the customer is receiving the mail, which is a compliance artifact rather than copy, and editing wording should not be able to delete it.

Unset templates fall back to the built-in defaults, so an install that never touches the settings screen behaves exactly as it did. The API reports an uncustomised template as null rather than as its default text, so "never edited" stays distinguishable from "edited to something identical", and DELETE restores the default by forgetting the row rather than writing the default into it.

Two problems surfaced during verification, both worth recording.

Five favorite-alert tests failed with no error and no mail. The cause was not this code: resetDb does not truncate admin_settings, so a subject of "Gone" stored by the new template tests survived into a later suite and changed the mail it was asserting on. Cleaning up inside the template tests would have fixed only that pairing, so resetDb now clears stored templates for every suite — template rows are test data like any other, and one outliving the suite that wrote it makes a failure appear somewhere unrelated.

The withdrawal notification then failed on timing. Loading copy from the database made the sender async, and the removal path was fire-and-forget, so the response could beat the mail out of the door. Dispatch was previously synchronous even though the sends themselves were not awaited; that is now restored by awaiting it.

Verified: 197 unit and 195 integration passing, lint unchanged at 4 warnings. The admin screen for editing these follows in the next commit.

Refs #92
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-21 18:57:52 -05:00
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5 b287c07747 feat: capture first and last name so emails can greet informally (#106)
Tests / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m38s
Tests / backend-unit (pull_request) Successful in 1m44s
Tests / frontend-e2e (pull_request) Failing after 9m50s
SonarQube Analysis / sonarqube (pull_request) Failing after 11m46s
Registration collected one optional Name, so every greeting had only a whole name to use: "Hi Thom Lamb," rather than "Hi Thom,". Both parts are now captured, and the cart reminder greets by first name.

Both are required of anyone new, refused individually rather than as a single "name is required" so a form that filled one and not the other is told which.

The columns are nullable even so, and that is deliberate. Marking them NOT NULL would mean backfilling legacy rows with empty strings, which asserts that every customer has a name — untrue of anyone who registered while the field was optional. The table records what is actually the case; the rule that new registrations must supply both lives in the route, where a missing field can produce a message naming it.

The backfill splits on the first space, and it is lossy in a way no version of this avoids. "Thom Lamb" becomes Thom and Lamb; "Mary Jane Smith" gets a last name of "Jane Smith"; names that are not two parts fare worse. It was chosen over leaving the columns empty because nothing currently lets a customer correct their own name — PUT /api/customers/me exists but no frontend calls it — so empty would have meant permanently unpersonalised for every existing customer. The migration says so, so nobody later reads backfilled values as data the customer supplied in that shape.

Verified against a seeded database rather than reasoned about, because this is the part that cannot be covered by the suite: migrations run in globalSetup before any test, and the old column is gone afterwards. Six representative rows through the real migration gave Thom/Lamb, Mary/"Jane Smith", Cher/null, "  Padded  Name  " trimmed to Padded/Name, and null and whitespace-only names left as null on both. The down migration rejoins the parts and returns all six to their original strings.

The old column is dropped rather than kept alongside, so there is one source of truth instead of two that drift.

The admin keeps receiving a single composed display name. It only ever shows one — the list cell and the drawer title — and never edits one, so giving it both parts plus the joining logic would be work for no reader.

Churn was the bulk of this: 14 backend registrations and 10 end-to-end registration forms. A first attempt at the backend fixtures also added names to login and password-reset payloads, which would still have passed since the server ignores unknown fields, but a login test implying login takes a name is a small lie; that was reverted and redone against register calls only.

Verified: 172 unit, 183 integration and 95 end-to-end passing, lint unchanged at 4 backend and 27 frontend warnings.

Not covered: the cart reminder itself, which runs from a cron and had no test before this either. The greeting change is a one-line substitution in that query.

Refs #106
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-21 18:23:13 -05:00
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5 a700597440 refactor: standardise antd imports and remove the avoidable any (#65)
SonarQube Analysis / sonarqube (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Tests / lint (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Tests / backend-unit (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Tests / frontend-e2e (pull_request) Canceled after 0s
Stage 1 of #65: this issue's original two lists. The type-checked gate it also owns follows in later stages.

Nine files imported antd from the barrel while the rest of the codebase used deep imports from antd/es. Both resolve to the same modules under antd v5 and Vite, so this is not the tree-shaking problem it would have been under v4 — the cost was that a documented convention had two spellings, and nobody reading a file could tell whether its style was deliberate or just old. Eighty-two imports converted, and every antd/es path was checked to exist before generating any of them rather than trusting a name-mangling rule.

The three `client: any` parameters in cartCheckout are now PoolClient. These functions run inside a transaction, and `any` removed exactly the check that would catch a pool-versus-client mix-up — which in this codebase means a query silently running outside the transaction it was meant to be part of, on the path that takes money.

publicCustomer took `any` and now takes a CustomerRow describing what it actually reads. Typed as its own shape rather than the whole table so that adding a column later — a password hash, a token, an internal note — cannot quietly start being echoed back to a customer.

The three `(window as any).paypal` casts are replaced by a declared interface for the injected SDK. It is deliberately narrow: it describes the three things this app calls, not the whole SDK, because a wider guess would be fiction and a wrong shape typed confidently is worse than an honest cast. The property is optional, since the SDK is absent until its script has loaded — which is the check both call sites already make.

Verified: 141 unit, 169 integration and 94 end-to-end passing. The end-to-end run is the one that matters here — an antd import migration can build cleanly and still break at runtime through styles or context, so a green tsc proves less than it appears to.

Lint drops from 8 warnings to 4 in the backend and 30 to 27 in the frontend, all of them the no-explicit-any this change removed. As a side effect the no-unsafe count that later stages exist to clear falls from 259 to 216 in the backend and 73 to 67 in the frontend, measured rather than estimated.

Refs #65
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-21 15:48:12 -05:00
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5 1d7aba2d60 fix(backend): route every async handler through the error middleware (#59)
Express 4 does not forward a rejected promise from an async handler, so an unwrapped async route never responds at all — the request hangs until the client gives up, nothing reaches the error middleware, and monitoring sees an open connection rather than a 500. That silence is the shape of the 2026-08-17 incident, where an unhandled rejection left every item query hanging and the storefront rendered it as an empty shop. `asyncRoute` was written in response, but it was only applied to some routes: 30 handlers added afterwards were still bare, including register, login, the whole cart, and PayPal checkout.

Wraps all 30, plus two the issue's inventory missed. `attachCustomer` is a bare async middleware mounted globally in app.ts, so a rejection in its session lookup would hang every request in the application — including the 25 handlers that were already wrapped correctly, which meant the guarantee did not actually hold anywhere. The PayPal webhook registers on a second router named `webhookRouter`, so an audit grepping for `router.` walked straight past it.

Adds a unit test that scans the route sources and fails on any registration whose handler is not wrapped. A convention already half-forgotten once will be forgotten again, and enforcement is what the issue asked for; ESLint would be the better home for it but there is no ESLint in this repo yet (#60). The test walks parens rather than lines, so it also catches a handler whose `async` sits on its own line, and it matches any `*Router` name rather than just `router` — the two ways the existing bare handlers escaped notice. It is deleted along with `asyncRoute` if the project moves to Express 5, which forwards rejections natively.

No behaviour changes on the success path; the failure path turns a hung request into a logged 500.

Closes #59

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-19 13:12:25 -05:00
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5 f626f27e75 feat: favorite items and notify when a favorite is sold (#34)
SonarQube Analysis / sonarqube (pull_request) Successful in 2m46s
Tests / backend-unit (pull_request) Successful in 44s
Tests / frontend-e2e (pull_request) Failing after 9m48s
Customers can favorite and unfavorite items from the storefront, opt in to being told when a favorite is sold to someone else, and manage that preference from their account page.

The opt-in is a consent of its own rather than the existing marketing flag. Being told that a specific item you asked about has gone is a narrower thing than agreeing to marketing, and folding one into the other would leave marketing_consent_text no longer describing what was actually agreed to. It is recorded the same way as the marketing consent — flag, timestamp, and the exact wording shown — and accepting it does not set marketing_consent.

The prompt appears only after a customer has actually favorited something, so the reason for asking is concrete rather than an abstract marketing ask, and it says plainly that it is separate from marketing email. Declining keeps the favorite.

Notifications fire when an item reaches sold, either through checkout or an admin marking it sold, and never to the buyer — telling someone the item they just bought is unavailable reads as a bug. Reserved is deliberately not a trigger: reservations expire and get released, so a "gone" email would often be about an item still for sale. Disabled accounts are excluded, per #33.

completeCheckout now returns the sold item ids and the buyer so its three call sites can notify after COMMIT. Sending inside the transaction would email people about a sale that then rolled back, and would hold the transaction open for SMTP. Each message is sent independently so one bad address cannot stop the rest, and the sale has already succeeded regardless.

Favoriting while signed out opens the existing inline register/login modal, exactly as Add to Cart does, and completes the favorite on success.

Also fixes a latent bug in the same component: while the session was still resolving, `customer` is null for a signed-in visitor too, so clicking Add to Cart or the new heart in that window prompted them to sign in again. Both now ignore clicks until the session has resolved, and the control shows as loading meanwhile.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 13:29:11 -05:00
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5 13c010ff51 feat(admin): disable and re-enable customer accounts (#33)
SonarQube Analysis / sonarqube (pull_request) Successful in 3m0s
Tests / backend-unit (pull_request) Successful in 48s
Tests / frontend-e2e (pull_request) Failing after 9m41s
Adds customers.disabled_at, admin disable/enable endpoints, a Status
column and toggle on the Customers tab, and enforcement across every
path that authenticates.

Enforcement lives in attachCustomer, which previously validated only the
session token and its expiry and never read the customer row. Register,
login and password reset all mint sessions, so a single check in the
middleware covers every path rather than three separate ones — and it
means an existing rd_session cookie stops working at once instead of at
its 30-day expiry. Disabling also deletes the sessions outright, so
eviction does not wait for the next request.

Disabling releases the items the customer was holding, in the same
transaction. A disabled account cannot check out, so leaving its
reservations would keep one-of-a-kind stock off the storefront for up to
the cart expiry window for no purpose. Guarded on 'reserved' so a sold
item is never resurrected. Re-enabling restores sign-in but does not give
the items back — they may since have sold.

Sign-in returns an explicit 403 rather than a generic credential failure.
That does confirm the address has an account, which sits awkwardly beside
the deliberately non-enumerating reset in #32; the trade was made the
other way because a disabled customer told "invalid email or password"
resets their password, succeeds, is still locked out, and concludes the
site is broken. The check runs only after the password verifies, so it is
not a bulk membership oracle, and /register already reveals existence.

A reset token issued before the disable no longer mints a session, and no
new tokens are issued for a disabled account — while still answering 200,
so that endpoint stays non-enumerating.

Self-service GDPR export and deletion are blocked along with everything
else, so those requests now need servicing by hand. Worth checking the
privacy policy does not promise unconditional self-service.

Also fixes an unrelated bug the e2e run surfaced: the admin inventory
fired a request per keystroke in the price fields with no sequencing, so
an older response could land after a newer one and repaint stale rows.
Only the most recently issued request may now set state.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-18 10:48:28 -05:00
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5 db7c61c89d feat: customer password reset via email round-trip (#32)
SonarQube Analysis / sonarqube (pull_request) Successful in 2m57s
Tests / backend-unit (pull_request) Successful in 53s
Tests / frontend-e2e (pull_request) Failing after 7m40s
Tests / backend-integration (pull_request) Failing after 3h14m41s
Adds "Forgot password?" to the login page, a request page, and a reset
page reached by a one-hour, single-use token delivered by email. Reuses
customer_tokens with a new password_reset kind alongside verify_email.

The request endpoint always answers 200, whether or not the address has
an account, so it cannot be used to test addresses for membership. Note
/register still reveals existence through its 409 on a duplicate, so this
protection is currently partial; closing that is its own change.

Completing a reset deletes every session for that customer. A reset
prompted by a compromise has to evict the intruder, and leaving a 30-day
cookie alive would defeat the point. It also marks the address verified,
since receiving the mail is exactly what verification proves, and
supersedes any outstanding token so an older link in the inbox cannot be
resurrected.

Introduces the first rate limiting in the codebase, on the request
endpoint only. The limiter is keyed on caller *and* submitted address:
keying on IP alone would let one person lock out everyone behind the same
proxy, and everything arrives via Nginx Proxy Manager. Applying that same
limiter to the reset endpoint, which carries no address, collapsed every
caller into one shared bucket -- so that endpoint is deliberately
unlimited instead, protected by a 32-byte single-use token whose bcrypt
work only runs after the token matches.

The e2e tests read the issued token directly from Postgres rather than
through a test-support endpoint. An endpoint returning a reset token for
an arbitrary address is account takeover for every customer if it is ever
reachable, and an environment gate is thin protection against that.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-17 17:36:19 -05:00
bermudalamb 921022c658 Add backend unit/integration tests, Playwright e2e tests, README, cookie Secure fix
SonarQube Analysis / sonarqube (push) Successful in 4m20s
2026-08-13 22:35:38 +00:00
bermudalamb 9be4986dd3 Initial commit: redefined-designs storefront 2026-08-13 21:07:54 +00:00