a3e8a7a1d8688e71e6fa3a1ffa30b6250585df76
3
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 bermudalamb
|
8de261538b |
refactor(frontend): declare props read-only, and drop the deprecated antd prop (#100)
Seventeen components declared props the compiler was free to assume were mutable, and one antd prop had gone stale. Both mechanical, neither with any behaviour attached.
React never writes to props, and `Readonly<>` says so to the compiler rather than only to the reader. This finishes a pattern the codebase had already chosen rather than introducing one: AccountDetails and EmailTemplateEditor were already written as `type Props = Readonly<{…}>`, so the thirteen named prop interfaces are converted to that same shape and the four context providers, which annotate `{ children }` inline, get `Readonly<{ children: React.ReactNode }>`.
Cart.tsx was the last place passing `destroyOnClose`, deprecated in antd 5.20. Twelve other call sites across the admin screens, the filter drawer and four customer modals already use `destroyOnHidden`, so this one was simply stale. Deprecated props keep working until they do not, and the failure then arrives as an antd upgrade breaking something unrelated to the change being made.
Counted rather than assumed, which the issue specifically asks for, because a `Readonly<>` in the wrong position type-checks and fixes nothing: lint goes from 31 warnings to 13, a drop of exactly eighteen, and both rules disappear from the breakdown entirely rather than merely thinning out.
What that leaves is the point of doing it. The remaining thirteen are eleven `set-state-in-effect` and two `no-alphabetical-sort` — so the frontend's warnings are now only the ones that need a decision, which is what makes #99 tractable. It had grown from the eight in that issue's title to eleven, two of them added by #97's clock tick and lapsed-cart refetch.
No behaviour change intended, so the bar was the end-to-end suite. Full run: 121 passed, 8 failed; all eight pass in a 45/45 serial re-run, which is the shared-database and event-loop flakiness this suite has had throughout.
Closes #100
|
||
 bermudalambandClaude Opus 5
|
b287c07747 |
feat: capture first and last name so emails can greet informally (#106)
Registration collected one optional Name, so every greeting had only a whole name to use: "Hi Thom Lamb," rather than "Hi Thom,". Both parts are now captured, and the cart reminder greets by first name. Both are required of anyone new, refused individually rather than as a single "name is required" so a form that filled one and not the other is told which. The columns are nullable even so, and that is deliberate. Marking them NOT NULL would mean backfilling legacy rows with empty strings, which asserts that every customer has a name — untrue of anyone who registered while the field was optional. The table records what is actually the case; the rule that new registrations must supply both lives in the route, where a missing field can produce a message naming it. The backfill splits on the first space, and it is lossy in a way no version of this avoids. "Thom Lamb" becomes Thom and Lamb; "Mary Jane Smith" gets a last name of "Jane Smith"; names that are not two parts fare worse. It was chosen over leaving the columns empty because nothing currently lets a customer correct their own name — PUT /api/customers/me exists but no frontend calls it — so empty would have meant permanently unpersonalised for every existing customer. The migration says so, so nobody later reads backfilled values as data the customer supplied in that shape. Verified against a seeded database rather than reasoned about, because this is the part that cannot be covered by the suite: migrations run in globalSetup before any test, and the old column is gone afterwards. Six representative rows through the real migration gave Thom/Lamb, Mary/"Jane Smith", Cher/null, " Padded Name " trimmed to Padded/Name, and null and whitespace-only names left as null on both. The down migration rejoins the parts and returns all six to their original strings. The old column is dropped rather than kept alongside, so there is one source of truth instead of two that drift. The admin keeps receiving a single composed display name. It only ever shows one — the list cell and the drawer title — and never edits one, so giving it both parts plus the joining logic would be work for no reader. Churn was the bulk of this: 14 backend registrations and 10 end-to-end registration forms. A first attempt at the backend fixtures also added names to login and password-reset payloads, which would still have passed since the server ignores unknown fields, but a login test implying login takes a name is a small lie; that was reverted and redone against register calls only. Verified: 172 unit, 183 integration and 95 end-to-end passing, lint unchanged at 4 backend and 27 frontend warnings. Not covered: the cart reminder itself, which runs from a cron and had no test before this either. The greeting change is a one-line substitution in that query. Refs #106 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
bermudalamb
|
5ebb366074 |
feat(auth): open sign-in and registration as modals over the page behind (#50)
/login, /register and /forgot-password rendered bare cards with no site header. They linked to each other and nowhere else, so a customer who clicked Log in from the storefront and changed their mind had no way back except the browser's back button. All four auth routes are now modals over the page the customer was already on, reusing the backdrop-location arrangement from #51: a direct visit or a link from an email opens over the storefront, so closing always lands somewhere real. They remain real routes, because /reset-password links to /login and customers may have bookmarks. Signing in or registering now returns the customer to the page behind, signed in, rather than moving them to /account. Someone who signs in while browsing wants to carry on browsing, and this is already how the cart and favorites prompts behave when they resume an interrupted action. The larger half of this is removing the duplication. Signing in existed twice — as these routes and again inside the prompt shown when a signed-out visitor adds to the cart or favorites something — and the two had already drifted. There were three different wordings of the marketing consent in circulation: the register page's, a shorter one in the prompt, and the string the server actually stores. The server keeps that text verbatim so the consent record says what the customer saw, which none of the three did. Both callers now render one shared AuthForm whose checkbox is the exact string the server records, and a test asserts that wording so it cannot drift again silently. Steps within the auth flow replace rather than push, so switching between tabs or stepping to password recovery leaves the whole detour as a single history entry and closing returns to where it started instead of walking back through every tab that was looked at. The privacy policy link opens in a new tab: following it in place would discard a part-filled signup form, and /privacy still has no way back of its own until #52. Test changes follow from the destination change rather than being incidental. Nineteen assertions across seven specs waited for /account after signing in; they now assert the header shows a signed-in customer, which is the condition actually being waited for. Modal submits are scoped to their dialog, because the storefront behind now offers a Log in button of its own and an unscoped locator matched both. Assertions that follow a server round-trip were given a realistic timeout — the 5s default is too tight for a bcrypt hash plus re-rendering the storefront behind the modal. Verified with 83 end-to-end tests, all passing, and type checking clean. No backend changes. Closes #50 |