9177b54deabc0eb9684c80ede2741d44405e10a3
9
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 synAdminandClaude Opus 5
|
8956b9f122 |
fix(items): read the id strictly, and stop the error test needing a route that does not (#307)
Item 5. GET /api/items/:id was the last route reading its id with a bare Number(), so an unreadable id reached Postgres and came back to the caller as a 500 for an item that cannot exist. It answers 404 now, like every other id-taking route since #207. It could not be fixed on its own, which is why it stayed. errorHandling.integration.test.ts used this route's looseness as its way of making a handler reject: tightening the parse would have left that test green while removing the thing it tests. So the test now fails a database call directly, with a spy on pool.query against a route that makes one. That is the failure the error middleware actually exists for, and it does not depend on any route declining to validate — the previous comment's own conclusion, that moving the trigger to cart.ts would only move the wart. Two things fixed along the way that the issue asked about but that switching to readId would not have delivered on its own. readId was not as strict as its name suggests. Number reads 5.0, 1e2, 0x10 and +5 as 5, 100, 16 and 5 — every one a positive integer, so every check readId made passed and the route fetched a real row for a URL nobody wrote. /items/5.0 answered with item 5. This never raised an error and so never announced itself; the issue noticed it only because #308 converted the comparison to a real integer. An id is a string of digits, so it is matched against digits before being parsed. readId is also now bounded at the top of a 32-bit serial. Above that Postgres raises 22003 rather than returning nothing, which is the same wrong answer to the caller as the 22P02 the function was written to prevent — a 500 for an id that identifies nothing. The leak assertion was passing for the wrong reason. It checks the response does not contain "syntax" or "items", and the error it was checking against happened to contain both only by accident of which route was used. The injected failure now contains both words deliberately, and the whole message is asserted against as well, so a future error format cannot slip through by wording itself differently. Verified: tsc clean, lint 0 errors with no new warnings, 485 unit tests passing across 33 suites — seven of them new, covering the inputs above. The integration suite cannot run on this machine, so whether the rewritten error test passes is for CI to say. Item 4, coverage, is not closed by this and cannot be closed yet: the SonarQube scan step has been skipped on every recent run because it is gated on the earlier steps succeeding, and those steps were failing. The dashboard is therefore stale. Reported on the issue rather than guessed at. Refs #307 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
synAdminandClaude Opus 5
|
955049eac9 |
fix(privacy): separate analytics consent from email consent (#56)
The previous commit widened the marketing consent sentence to cover the Brevo tracker, so one checkbox carried both purposes. That is the specific pattern GDPR rejects: consent has to be granular, and current EDPB guidance treats bundling tracking consent with subscription consent as invalid because the customer cannot accept one purpose and refuse the other. Quebec's Law 25 s.8.1 is stricter again — profiling technology has to be off until the person switches it on, with no pre-ticked box and no consent inherited from agreeing to something else. Building to both standards was the decision, since the storefront is publicly reachable and anyone can register. So the marketing sentence is restored to exactly what it was, which leaves every existing email consent valid and untouched, and analytics gets its own column, its own sentence, its own checkbox at registration, its own toggle in the account page and its own endpoint. A customer can now hold either, both, or neither, and withdrawing one does not disturb the other. The migration defaults analytics_consent to false, which is both the honest answer — none of the existing customers was ever asked — and what Law 25 requires. Nothing about this change opts anybody in. Two details that are compliance requirements rather than wording preferences. The sentence names Brevo instead of saying "our email provider", because informed consent means the customer can tell who receives their data and a description they cannot act on is not disclosure. And the account toggle is as prominent and as easy to switch off as it is to switch on, because withdrawal has to be as easy as consenting. The analytics endpoint is separate from the marketing one rather than a second field on it, so that a single call cannot change an answer the customer did not touch — the bundling problem moved from the form into the API. The unit tests now assert the two consents stay apart in both directions, including that the marketing sentence still says nothing about tracking, because re-bundling them would otherwise pass silently and is the mistake this project already made once. Verified: backend tsc clean, both lint suites 0 errors with no new warnings, 478 unit tests passing across 33 suites, frontend production build green. Not verified: the migration has not been run against a database, and integration and e2e need a Node this machine does not have active. None of this is legal advice and the wording is worth a lawyer's eye before it ships. Refs #56 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
synAdminandClaude Opus 5
|
ac3f6e91f5 |
feat(analytics): report consenting customers' activity to Brevo (#56)
Loads Brevo's web tracker for a signed-in customer who has consented, reports route changes as page views, and tracks the three events the issue asked for: added_to_cart, favorited, and checkout_completed. The four design questions were settled on the issue in August and this implements those answers. The consent gate is the part worth reading. The decision recorded on the issue was "gate it behind consent", but the sentence customers actually agreed to named only email: "I want to receive occasional emails about new one-of-a-kind items". Gating a tracker on `marketing_consent` while that was the stored wording would have treated "email me about new items" as authorisation to send someone's browsing to a third party, which it does not say — and this project stores the wording verbatim against each customer precisely so that a record says what the customer saw. So the sentence is widened here, and the tracker is gated on `analytics_consent`, a field the server computes by comparing the wording stored against a customer with the current constant. Changing the sentence therefore does not retroactively widen anybody's consent: everyone who agreed to the old text keeps their email consent and is not tracked until they re-consent through the account page. A boolean alone could not tell those two populations apart, which is the whole reason the text is stored per customer. `analyticsConsent` is exported and has its own unit test, because "agreeing to the old wording does not authorise tracking" is the rule that silently tracks people if it regresses — their flag really is true. QA stays out of the live Brevo account by construction rather than by remembering. The key is per-environment, the tracker never loads without one, and `docker-compose.qa.yml` sets an empty literal with no stack variable behind it, so nothing can inherit a value from the host or be pasted in from production's stack. Same reasoning as QA_DB_PASSWORD and the QA_SMTP_ names beside it. Events are reported from the API layer rather than the UI call sites, so no caller can add to the cart or favorite an item without it being counted, and each fires only after the response was accepted — a refused add is not reported as one. The two checkout completions each name their processor, because a demo purchase charges nothing and counting it as a sale would overstate revenue. The privacy policy gains an analytics section in this change rather than a follow-up, since the published policy previously described none of this and would otherwise have lagged the code. It is deliberate about the limits: withdrawing consent stops further reporting, but anything already sent stays with Brevo, and a script already injected cannot be un-injected — `stopBrevoTracking` stops calls, it does not unload sa.js. That is said in the code too, because "tracking stops" reads as a stronger promise than any web tracker can make. Verified: backend tsc clean, both lint suites 0 errors with no new warnings, 474 unit tests passing across 33 suites, and the frontend production build green including the compose-environment guard. Not verified: integration and e2e, which need a database and a Node this machine does not have active, and no real Brevo key was exercised — the tracker has never been observed reporting to an actual account. Closes #56 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
 bermudalambandClaude Opus 5
|
f52976dec9 |
fix(admin): answer 404 for an item id that does not exist (#207)
Three routes in admin.ts answered a miss with a success. PUT /items/:id ran an UPDATE that matched nothing, committed happily, selected nothing back and replied 200 with an empty body — a success the admin client could do nothing with, and no record anywhere that the item was not found. mark-sold and mark-available did the same. The create route beside them has always used requireRow for exactly this, which is why this reads as an oversight rather than a decision.
A garbage id was worse in a different direction. Number('abc') is NaN, the driver sends it to Postgres as the text "NaN", Postgres raises 22P02 for an integer column, and the catch turned that into a 500 — so a caller asking for an item that cannot exist was told the server broke. Both now answer 404, because from the caller's side "/items/abc" identifies no item in exactly the way "/items/999999" does.
readId is shared rather than repeated, and rejects zero, negatives and fractions as well as text: every id in this schema is a positive serial, so anything else identifies nothing.
mark-sold now notifies favouriters only after the row is known to exist, so nobody is told about a sale that did not happen.
The issue asked for the same shape to be checked across the other admin routes. It was: unpublish already looks the item up and 404s, and the tags and categories PUT routes both do an existence check before their UPDATE, so their rows[0] is guaranteed. items.ts already guards the public read. These three were the only ones lying about a miss.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
bermudalamb
|
3392f6f10d |
feat(intake): issue and revoke named upload links (#222)
Three routes behind the admin gate: list, create, revoke. A link is named because provenance matters more than convenience — when one is shared further than intended the question is which one, and every submission will record the link it arrived through, so revoking kills that link rather than the feature. The token is returned by exactly one response and is unrecoverable afterwards, which is why the admin screen has to present it as a one-time reveal. The listing selects its columns explicitly rather than `SELECT *`, so `token_hash` cannot reach a response the moment somebody adds a convenience — and a test asserts the listing carries neither the token nor the digest. An absent `maxSubmissions` gets a bounded default of 25 rather than null. Absent means nobody decided; an explicit null means unlimited, which is a decision visible in the request. Reading absent as unlimited is what would quietly make every link unbounded, and the common case is the one that has to be safe. Revoking is idempotent through COALESCE, and a test asserts the second call returns the *same* timestamp rather than merely succeeding. The useful fact is when access ended, and a button that errors on a double-click teaches people to distrust it — which is the last thing wanted on the control that contains a leak. Mounted above the `/api/admin` catch-all, which would otherwise swallow the path, and behind requireAdminGate on the router itself per the reasoning in middleware/adminGate.ts. Lint caught me reintroducing something this codebase had already solved: I wrote `.replace(/\/+$/, '')` to trim PUBLIC_URL, and app.ts carried a hand-written loop with a comment explaining that exact regex backtracks. Rather than duplicate the loop, trimTrailingSlashes moved to utils.ts and both callers now share it. Backend: 272 integration (9 new), 308 unit, lint back to its 6 pre-existing warnings, build clean. Ref #222 |
||
|
bermudalamb
|
f32913ef51 |
refactor: turn on noUncheckedIndexedAccess in both workspaces (#101)
Indexing an array now yields `T | undefined`, which is what it always did — the compiler simply says so. Enabled in backend/tsconfig.json and frontend/tsconfig.json, and in tsconfig.sonar.json alongside it so the drift guard stays satisfied. The sequencing this issue insisted on was right, and the numbers show why. Before #159 typed the query results, `rows[0]` was `any` and `any` indexes to `any`: the flag would have found close to nothing and the count would have changed completely afterwards. With the rows typed it finds 57 — 50 in the backend, 4 in the frontend, 3 in the Playwright suite — and they fall into three kinds. Thirty are `rows[0]` after a `rows.length` guard. TypeScript cannot connect the two, and rewriting them as `const [row] = rows; if (!row) …` makes the guard and the use the same check, which is better code independently of the flag. Ten are rows a statement guarantees — `INSERT … RETURNING`, or a lookup for an id the session middleware has already matched. These get `requireRow(rows, what)`, a new helper in db.ts that throws naming the query. A thrown error rather than a non-null assertion: if the assumption is ever wrong, an assertion hands `undefined` to the next line and fails somewhere unrelated, whereas this fails at the query and says which. asyncRoute turns it into a 500, which is the right answer for "the database did not do what the statement says it does". It also states the assumption once instead of ten times. The rest is ordinary indexing the compiler cannot prove: a regex capture group that the pattern guarantees, `split('+')[0]`, a modulo kept in range, `hasOwnProperty` failing to narrow an index signature, and Express typing route params as an index signature so `req.params.itemId` is `string | undefined` on a route that cannot match without it. One correction to this issue's premise, which matters for what it was expected to find. The body says "in a handful it does not guard at all", and the unguarded-500 risk it describes was not found. Every `rows[0]` either sits behind a length check or behind a statement that guarantees a row. What the flag actually bought was the ten places where that guarantee was real but unstated, and those now say so. Two changes worth calling out because they are not mechanical. TAG_COLORS is typed `[string, ...string[]]` in both copies rather than `as const` — the first attempt used `as const`, which narrowed the elements to literals and broke adminTags, so the annotation keeps `string` while telling the compiler index 0 exists. And the filter drawer's slider falls back to the bounds it was given rather than to null, because null there reads as "no filter" and would widen the results rather than leave them unchanged. Test files needed changes too, since ts-jest compiles them against the same config: a regex destructure in the compose guard, and ten `mock.calls[0][0]` reads where the surrounding assertions already establish the call happened. Verified: tsc clean over backend, frontend src and the Playwright suite; unit 254/254; integration 238/238; frontend build clean; lint unchanged in both workspaces. Closes #101 |
||
|
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5
|
9222e97deb |
feat(api): categories, tags, and storefront item filters (#23)
Adds a self-referencing categories tree, a tag registry with deterministic colours, and item_tags, plus admin CRUD for both. GET /api/items now accepts category, tags, min_price and max_price. Category matching walks the subtree with a recursive CTE so selecting a parent includes everything filed beneath it; tags match with AND via a count check, since ANY() alone would return items carrying only one of them. Malformed filter params return 400 rather than being ignored, so a broken link doesn't quietly list the whole catalogue. GET /api/filters serves the drawer its tree, tags, and price bounds in one request. Item image/tag aggregation moves from LEFT JOIN + GROUP BY to scalar subqueries. Joining two one-to-many relations multiplies their rows, so an item with 2 images and 3 tags would have repeated every image three times once tags were added. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
bermudalamb
|
81118245ce | fix: sonarqube denial of service issue | ||
|
bermudalamb
|
921022c658 |
Add backend unit/integration tests, Playwright e2e tests, README, cookie Secure fix
SonarQube Analysis / sonarqube (push) Successful in 4m20s
|