Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5 42412e8eeb fix(e2e): restore the frontend build by typing the responses findOrFail searches (#254)
Linting / lint (pull_request) Successful in 2m10s
SonarQube Analysis / sonarqube (pull_request) Successful in 28m5s
main did not build, so every Portainer deploy failed with `npm run build` exit code 2. My regression from #241.

findOrFail<T>(items: T[], predicate: (item: T) => boolean) infers T from both parameters. The call sites annotate the predicate as documentation, and the arrays come from .json(), which is any and offers no competing candidate — so T became the one-field shape written in the lambda and every caller failed on the field it actually wanted. Array.prototype.find has no such problem, which is why the code this replaced type-checked.

The four responses are now typed at their call sites, so T is inferred from real data and the predicates need no annotation. findOrFail additionally takes NoInfer<T> on its predicate, so a stray annotation can never drive the element type again. The specs are better typed than before this change: `.json()` was plain any, and the annotations only ever documented a shape nothing enforced.

I did not catch this because I verified with a bare `npx tsc --noEmit`, and tsconfig.json is `"include": ["src"]` — it structurally cannot see tests/. The specs are checked by the second command in `npm run build`, which is the step Docker runs and the step that failed. Verified this time with `npm run build` itself, plus lint, the unit suite, and two consecutive full e2e passes.

Closes #254

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-01 09:09:01 -05:00
bermudalamb 64324609e1 test(e2e): add a find-or-fail helper for collection lookups (#241)
Linting / lint (pull_request) Successful in 2m10s
SonarQube Analysis / sonarqube (pull_request) Successful in 19m45s
Nine sites across five specs do `collection.find(...)` and dereference the result immediately. When the row is missing the test dies with "Cannot read properties of undefined" naming a line of test plumbing, which says nothing about what was expected — and that is exactly how favorites-filter:169 failed without producing a usable signal.

The message names what was wanted and how many rows were searched. That distinction carries real diagnostic weight: "0 rows" means the fixture never landed, "37 rows" means it landed and the predicate is wrong, and those are different bugs to chase.

It lives in its own module importing nothing, rather than in support/api.ts. That file imports @playwright/test, and vitest.config.ts runs tests/unit with environment: 'node' — putting six lines of pure logic there would drag a browser harness into the unit suite to test them. api.ts re-exports it so specs still reach it through fixtures.

Throws rather than returning null, because every caller wants the row: an error at the point of the miss beats a null threaded through three more lines before something unrelated fails.

Frontend: 30 unit tests pass, lint unchanged at 2 pre-existing warnings, build clean.

Ref #241
2026-08-30 17:02:07 -05:00