7ca07bd4a0e33e85b8f2f4c8657a0d2562fa40aa
2
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  bermudalambandClaude Opus 5
|
ecc2219fa5 |
feat: stage new items as pending until an admin publishes them (#90)
An item used to be live on the storefront the instant it was created. Now it starts pending, and a customer sees it only once it is published. The migration changes the column default and nothing else. Backfilling would un-publish the entire live catalogue, which is the one thing it must not do. Hiding a pending item took four separate changes, not one, and that is the part worth knowing. The storefront's item routes had no status filter at all — sold items are listed and rendered with a Sold badge deliberately — so pending could not be expressed as one more optional filter. GET /api/items now carries an exclusion the caller cannot opt out of; GET /api/items/:id carries the same, because hiding an item from the list while still serving it by id would leave it reachable to anyone who kept a link; and GET /api/filters excludes pending from both aggregates it computes. That last one is the least obvious: a pending item would have inflated its tags' counts, so a customer would read "Rare (1)", filter by it, and be told nothing matches — and its price would have stretched the slider to a range no visible item occupies. The tag count is computed over the joined items rather than filtered with a WHERE. A WHERE would have dropped the row for a tag whose only item is pending, and the tag would have vanished from the drawer instead of showing zero. There is a test for exactly that, because the first version of this query had that bug. parseItemFilters is shared by the storefront and admin routes, so 'pending' parses on both. The public route refuses it explicitly rather than answering with an empty list, which would read as "no items match" instead of "you may not ask that". The storefront's URL reader is deliberately left not accepting it either, with a comment saying so, since a request guaranteed to fail is not worth constructing. Publishing is the existing mark-available: same transition, same UPDATE, so the admin UI labels that button "Publish" when the item is pending rather than adding a second endpoint that does the same thing. Unpublish is new and is not symmetrical — it is refused for a reserved item, which someone is holding in their cart right now, and for a sold one, which is a record of something that happened rather than a draft. Both refusals name their reason, and the buttons are hidden in those states so the refusal is not how you find out. Changing a column default has reach, and it surfaced eight test fixtures that silently depended on it. Each is now explicit about the status it wants rather than inheriting one — better practice regardless, and immune to the next default change. Two tests also used 'pending' as their example of an *unknown* status; both would have quietly become tautologies, so they now use one that is genuinely unknown. Verified: 98 unit, 160 integration and 94 end-to-end passing, the last on a freshly created container. One earlier run showed a single failure in favorites.spec.ts; it passes in isolation and on a clean container, and is the cross-spec interference already recorded against the suite rather than anything from this change. Refs #90 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5
|
03f08074d1 |
feat(frontend): preview an inventory item as a customer sees it (#89)
Clicking an item's name in the admin Inventory opens a drawer rendering the real storefront ItemCard for it, so the way a listing will look can be checked without publishing it and going to see. The name cell is a link-styled button rather than a clickable cell, so it stays reachable by keyboard and announces itself as an action. Admin already imports Item from ../api, the same type the storefront uses, so the row object goes straight into the card with no adapter and nothing to drift. The part that needed care is that ItemCard is not a passive component. It wires into the cart and favorites contexts and has working buttons, and both providers wrap the whole app — so a naive preview would have been fully functional, and an admin browsing inventory could have added their own stock to their own cart. On a one-of-a-kind catalogue that reserves the item and takes it off sale. ItemCard therefore takes an optional preview prop that short-circuits its two click handlers. Those two are the only entry points, so guarding them also covers the shared auth modal and the favorite-alerts consent prompt hanging off them. Deliberately not `disabled` on the buttons. A disabled antd button renders in a different colour with a different cursor and no hover, and the whole point of this panel is to show what a customer will actually see. The controls keep their normal appearance and their correct state for the item's status; only the handlers stop. The comment on the prop says so, because "simplifying" this to a disabled button would quietly defeat the feature while appearing to implement it. Four end-to-end tests, two of which are the ones worth having. Clicking Add to Cart in the preview must do nothing — asserted by the sign-in prompt never appearing, which a real click on a signed-out card always raises, so its absence proves the handler stopped before doing any work. And the storefront card must still be live where it is actually used, or this change would have quietly broken buying things. ItemCard's props are now Readonly, which was an existing lint warning on a file this change already touches: frontend warnings drop from 31 to 30. Verified: build clean, lint 0 errors, 91 end-to-end tests passing against a freshly created database. Refs #89 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |