70cc3056e76175bbf71e9aa874df7588057821d0
2
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 bermudalamb
|
f32913ef51 |
refactor: turn on noUncheckedIndexedAccess in both workspaces (#101)
Indexing an array now yields `T | undefined`, which is what it always did — the compiler simply says so. Enabled in backend/tsconfig.json and frontend/tsconfig.json, and in tsconfig.sonar.json alongside it so the drift guard stays satisfied. The sequencing this issue insisted on was right, and the numbers show why. Before #159 typed the query results, `rows[0]` was `any` and `any` indexes to `any`: the flag would have found close to nothing and the count would have changed completely afterwards. With the rows typed it finds 57 — 50 in the backend, 4 in the frontend, 3 in the Playwright suite — and they fall into three kinds. Thirty are `rows[0]` after a `rows.length` guard. TypeScript cannot connect the two, and rewriting them as `const [row] = rows; if (!row) …` makes the guard and the use the same check, which is better code independently of the flag. Ten are rows a statement guarantees — `INSERT … RETURNING`, or a lookup for an id the session middleware has already matched. These get `requireRow(rows, what)`, a new helper in db.ts that throws naming the query. A thrown error rather than a non-null assertion: if the assumption is ever wrong, an assertion hands `undefined` to the next line and fails somewhere unrelated, whereas this fails at the query and says which. asyncRoute turns it into a 500, which is the right answer for "the database did not do what the statement says it does". It also states the assumption once instead of ten times. The rest is ordinary indexing the compiler cannot prove: a regex capture group that the pattern guarantees, `split('+')[0]`, a modulo kept in range, `hasOwnProperty` failing to narrow an index signature, and Express typing route params as an index signature so `req.params.itemId` is `string | undefined` on a route that cannot match without it. One correction to this issue's premise, which matters for what it was expected to find. The body says "in a handful it does not guard at all", and the unguarded-500 risk it describes was not found. Every `rows[0]` either sits behind a length check or behind a statement that guarantees a row. What the flag actually bought was the ten places where that guarantee was real but unstated, and those now say so. Two changes worth calling out because they are not mechanical. TAG_COLORS is typed `[string, ...string[]]` in both copies rather than `as const` — the first attempt used `as const`, which narrowed the elements to literals and broke adminTags, so the annotation keeps `string` while telling the compiler index 0 exists. And the filter drawer's slider falls back to the bounds it was given rather than to null, because null there reads as "no filter" and would widen the results rather than leave them unchanged. Test files needed changes too, since ts-jest compiles them against the same config: a regex destructure in the compose guard, and ten `mock.calls[0][0]` reads where the surrounding assertions already establish the call happened. Verified: tsc clean over backend, frontend src and the Playwright suite; unit 254/254; integration 238/238; frontend build clean; lint unchanged in both workspaces. Closes #101 |
||
|
bermudalamb
|
89fc7c5c1b |
feat(backend): add an application-layer gate to the admin API (#63)
Authorization for the admin panel and the admin API has lived entirely in one auth_request regex in an Nginx Proxy Manager config outside this repository. That control is real and it works — nothing is publicly exposed today — but it is invisible from the code, untested here, and not reviewed when this code changes. Three things follow from that, and the first is the one worth the change. An admin route added at a path the regex does not match is unprotected the moment it is written, and nothing in Express indicates that. Anything reaching the published container port directly bypasses authentik entirely. And locally there is no gate at all, so no developer ever sees the boundary being enforced. requireAdminGate is attached to each admin router rather than to a path prefix, which is what makes it useful rather than merely redundant with the proxy. An admin router added later at some other path inherits the gate; because the proxy only injects the header on paths its regex matches, that router refuses on its first request instead of being quietly public. A 403 in that situation is the boundary reporting that it has drifted. The gate is optional, and unset means exactly today's behaviour. That keeps local development and all 113 existing admin test call sites working untouched, and means shipping the image before configuring the proxy cannot take the admin panel down. What it does not do is stay silent about it: the server warns at boot when the gate is inactive, naming what is unprotected. This project has been bitten repeatedly by controls that report success while doing nothing, and an unconfigured gate should be a visible choice rather than an invisible one. An empty value is treated as unset rather than as a secret, because enforcing an empty secret would admit any caller sending an empty header. Comparison is timing-safe over SHA-256 digests of both sides: timingSafeEqual throws on buffers of unequal length, so comparing raw values would turn a short header into a 500 rather than a 403, and a length check first would leak the secret's length. Turning it on requires the secret in two places at once — the stack environment and a proxy_set_header line on the gated location in NPM. Setting only one gives 403s until the other catches up. That coupling, and the three consequences above, are now written into the README beside the deployment section, since none of it is visible from the code. Verified over real HTTP as well as in tests. Booting without the secret logs the warning and serves admin normally; booting with it returns 403 for a missing header, 403 for a wrong one, 200 for the right one, and leaves the public storefront at 200 throughout, with each refusal logged distinguishably and without echoing the value it was sent. 8 new unit tests, 9 new integration tests covering every admin router separately — a correct middleware nobody mounted would pass the unit tests and protect nothing. 106 unit and 153 integration passing, lint 0 errors and 8 warnings unchanged. Refs #63 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |