Commit Graph
1 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5 2a20c0e05b ci: manual workflow to build and publish the QA image (#25)
SonarQube Analysis / sonarqube (pull_request) Successful in 2m34s
Tests / backend-unit (pull_request) Successful in 36s
Tests / backend-integration (pull_request) Failing after 3h3m42s
Tests / frontend-e2e (pull_request) Failing after 7m32s
Adds a workflow_dispatch job that builds a chosen ref, pushes it to the
Gitea container registry as :qa plus a commit-sha tag, and emails when it
is ready. It deliberately does not restart the QA stack — redeploying
stays a human action in Portainer.

The build runs against a Docker-in-Docker service rather than the NAS's
Docker socket. Mounting the host socket into the runner would give every
workflow on every branch root-equivalent control of the NAS, production
included; pushing to a registry means the image does not need to survive
in the build daemon.

The QA stack now pulls that image instead of requiring a local build. The
previous arrangement meant the image existed only if someone remembered
to build it, which produced two confusing failures already: a Docker Hub
"pull access denied" when the tag was missing, and a silent stale-image
deploy when the build had not been rerun.

Two runner capabilities cannot be verified from here — privileged service
containers for dind, and a docker CLI in the runner image. The workflow
checks both and fails with an explanation rather than a connection
refused, and validates all five required secrets and variables up front
rather than part-way through a build.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-17 19:10:04 -05:00