The public intake POST now reads a `removeBackground` multipart field and stores it on the new `item_drafts.remove_background` column. The checkbox on the submission page is ticked by default, so a client that sends nothing gets `true` — only the exact string `'false'` opts out, so a stray or unexpected value is treated as consent rather than a silent refusal.
The GET now also reports `backgroundRemoval: isRembgConfigured()` alongside the label, so the submission page knows up front whether the feature exists in this environment at all. Neither handler calls the sidecar or the AI — this task only records intent for the drafting worker to act on later, and the existing ordering of `requireUsableLink` and `requireCapacity` ahead of `uploadImages` is unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The check is ordered ahead of uploadImages, for the same reason requireUsableLink is: a refused submission must write zero bytes. Ordering it after would accept the upload, store the files and then throw them away, which is the expensive half of the work the ceiling exists to prevent. A test asserts nothing is stored.
503, not 403. The sender has done nothing wrong, their link is fine, and the condition clears by itself as the window rolls — so the link stays usable and works again the moment there is room.
The ceiling never touches the admin upload path, which has its own test. Intake being throttled is an inconvenience; the shop being unable to add its own stock is an outage.
reset-ceiling is declared above /:id/revoke because Express matches in order and would otherwise read it as an id and try to revoke a link named "reset-ceiling". That has its own test too.
The per-link alert is a named function rather than the inline IIFE the plan wrote. routesAreWrapped.test.ts flags any async inside a route registration not directly wrapped in asyncRoute, and it cannot tell an inner IIFE from an unwrapped handler — nor should it have to. The guard caught this, and the extraction reads better than what it rejected.
Backend now 373 unit and 337 integration, all passing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two drivers. The call after a successful submission means a draft is usually waiting by the time anybody looks; the five-minute sweep means a restart mid-draft is recoverable rather than a permanently stalled row, and picks up whatever the first call missed.
Neither is awaited. A slow or failing model must not become a failed upload for someone who did nothing wrong, which is the whole reason drafting does not happen inline — the cost of a dropped call is a few minutes' delay, not a lost submission.
Both catch for themselves. The comment beside the existing schedulers points out that `void` is only safe because those functions handle their own errors, and draftQueued does not: its first query can reject, and an escaping rejection would take the container down.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adding e2e specs for the submission page found a defect in the page they were written for, which is what they were for.
One limiter counted page loads and submissions against the same twenty-per-quarter-hour allowance, so a sender working through a box of stock ran out after ten items — the exact person the feature exists for, and the exact case the limiter's own comment said must not be refused. The comment said refusing them costs a consignment while the number quietly did it.
Worse, the page could not tell a 429 from a 404. `fetchIntakeLink` treated any non-OK response as "no link", so a throttled sender was told "This link is not active" and sent to ask for a replacement — which could not have helped, because the problem was their address and a minute of patience. Two conditions needing opposite reactions were sharing a message.
Now two limiters, because the two requests cost different things. Reading a link hits one indexed row and writes nothing, so that allowance is generous at 120: someone re-reading the form or losing their signal should never be told to wait. Submitting writes up to six files, so that is the one worth bounding, at 30 — more than anyone photographing items can manage and far less than a script would want.
The page gains a third state. Unknown, revoked and used-up still collapse into one "not active" card, because whether a link exists is not something a stranger needs to learn. Throttled is deliberately kept apart from them, since "wait a moment" and "go and ask for another link" are opposite instructions.
Measured rather than assumed, on a freshly started process both times: before, 25 page loads produced 14 rejections; after, 40 produce none. The first attempt at that measurement was wrong and worth recording — the restart had failed with EADDRINUSE, so it read 30 of 30 against the old process's already-exhausted store.
The two specs now pass in a full parallel run alongside everything else. They are scoped the way #241 asks: unique run ids, assertions naming only this run's rows, nothing asserted about the table as a whole.
Backend: 284 integration, 309 unit. Frontend: build clean, lint unchanged at 2 pre-existing warnings.
Ref #222, #241
The public way in. Photos of one item plus a free-text note, from someone with no account, landing as an `items` row at status 'pending' — already invisible to every public and storefront query since #90, so nothing is live by accident.
Every refusal is a 404. Unknown, revoked and exhausted links are indistinguishable from outside, because whether a link exists is not something a stranger needs to be able to learn — the same reasoning uploads.ts applies to files.
The link is resolved *before* multer runs, and that ordering is the point rather than an implementation detail. discardUnlessAccepted would delete the files afterwards, but "written then deleted" is materially worse than "never written" on an endpoint the whole internet can reach: it is disk churn an unauthenticated caller controls, and it leans on an unlink that a crash between write and delete would skip. A test asserts the volume is untouched for a bad token, so a future reordering fails loudly instead of quietly handing that control away.
The link counter is incremented inside the transaction and guarded on the same conditions as the lookup, so two submissions racing for the last slot of a capped link cannot both succeed. The response carries no item id: the sender has no business knowing about the catalogue and nothing they could do with it.
The AI is deliberately not called here. A slow or failing model request must not turn into a failed upload for someone who did nothing wrong, and the photos may be the only copy — the item is often no longer in the sender's hands. The row waits at state 'queued' for #223.
The new limiter keys on the caller alone, since a submission carries no email. keyByCallerAndEmail's comment warns that a bare ip bucket is a shared allowance, and that trade is taken knowingly: the link is the per-caller identity and its cap is the per-caller bound, while this limiter does the different job of bounding what one address can throw at an endpoint that writes files. Twenty per fifteen minutes is deliberately looser than the password-reset allowance — somebody photographing a box of stock legitimately submits several in a row, and refusing them costs a consignment.
Because the route mounts the shared uploadImages, it inherits the type allowlist, the magic-byte check and #226's EXIF stripping without asking for any of them. A test asserts the stripping specifically, since this is the route where it matters most: the photo comes from a stranger's phone rather than the shop's own camera.
Backend: 284 integration (12 new), 309 unit, lint unchanged at 6 pre-existing warnings, build clean.
Ref #222
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5