main
14
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 synAdminandClaude Opus 5
|
9cc82002b8 |
feat(auth): groundwork for signing in with Google (#340)
Nothing a customer can see. The schema change and the configuration land on their own so the widest-reaching edit in the project can be reviewed for what it is rather than buried inside a feature. The password hash becomes nullable. That is one line and it is not the work; the work is that every read of the column is now a question rather than a fact. Three places compared against it with bcrypt, and all three now ask first through one shared function. That function exists because the alternative is worse than a wrong answer. bcrypt.compare throws on a null hash rather than returning false, so any call site that forgot the check would answer a sign-in attempt with a 500 instead of a refusal. On the login route that is also an oracle, because it would happen for exactly the accounts that have no password. One function rather than a null check repeated three times means the question is asked identically everywhere and a fourth site cannot forget to ask it. Nothing writes a null yet. The first accounts without a password arrive with the sign-up path, which is why this is landed ahead of them. The identities table is a table rather than columns on customers, because one customer may eventually hold more than one. Columns would make a second provider a migration and a third an embarrassment. Its important column is the provider subject, and the comment on it is the whole security posture of the feature in one place: never the email. An email is a display value its owner can change and a provider may reassign; a subject is opaque and stable for the life of the account. Matching on the email would strand a customer who changed theirs and, far worse, hand their account to whoever inherited the old address. Unique across the provider and subject together, not the subject alone. The down migration drops the table and deliberately does not restore the NOT NULL. Re-adding it fails outright once a passwordless customer exists, and a down migration that destroys accounts to satisfy a constraint is far worse than a column that is merely more permissive than it needs to be. The redirect URI is derived from PUBLIC_URL, the same single source the WebAuthn Relying Party ID uses and for the same reason: Google compares it as an exact string and answers a mismatch with a message that says nothing about which half is wrong. Deriving it means the value is correct by construction anywhere the email links already are. The tests are mostly about what must not end up in it, since a trailing slash on PUBLIC_URL is an easy way to produce a URI that is one character from the registered one. The config also reports whether it is enabled at all, so a developer without credentials gets a storefront that works and simply does not offer the button, rather than one that offers it and fails. Absent rather than disabled, the same choice made for a browser without WebAuthn. Environment validation refuses to boot on one credential without the other, matching how the SMTP pair is handled. Half-configured is the case worth catching because the failure otherwise arrives at the moment a customer presses the button. The QA compose file sets both to empty, and the comment there says why at length rather than leaving it to look like an oversight. Google refuses a redirect URI whose host is not under a domain whose ownership has been proved by DNS, and nobody can prove ownership of anything under bermudalamb.synology.me because Synology owns the registrable domain above it. That is the same wall #285 hit with Cloudflare. So QA cannot run this at all until #313 moves it to a subdomain of the real domain, at which point it is two stack variables and one console entry, with no code change either way. Also corrects the record in #332, which lists account deletion as confirming with a password. It does not; the route takes none and the confirmation is a modal in the account page. Deletion needed no change here. Verified: backend tsc clean for src and tests, 550 unit tests pass including new coverage of the config derivation, the null-hash comparison and the environment rules; lint clean apart from warnings that predate this branch. The integration suite needs a database this machine has no Docker for. Closes #340 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
synAdminandClaude Opus 5
|
90e372d6bd |
feat(admin): move a customer's account to an address they can reach (#337)
The third step of the only recovery route a customer who has lost their mailbox has. The first two are contacting the shop and being verified against order history. The third had no implementation, so the answer was a hand-written database edit that left no record of who did it or why. The thing to say plainly, because everything here follows from it: this operation and an account takeover are the same operation. They differ only in whether the verification was sound, and nothing in the software can check that. What the software can do is make the change recorded, announced, and complete in its effects. Recorded. The endpoint refuses without a written reason, and the reason is stored against the account. That row is the only thing that tells a genuine recovery from a takeover afterwards, which is why a hand edit was never acceptable and why the field is required by the server rather than merely collected by the form. It is never shown to the customer: it is a note about how somebody was verified and can name things the customer should not be handed back. There is no column for who did it. Admin access is one shared gate secret in front of a single operator, so such a column could only ever hold a constant, and a constant dressed up as an identity is worse than an honest absence. Announced, to the address being replaced. If the recovery was sound that reaches nobody and costs nothing. If it was not, it reaches the real owner, who is the only person in the world who can say so, and that is the only reason this endpoint is safe to have at all. Its own template rather than the self-service one, because that copy says to contact us if you did not make this change, and here somebody already did — the sentence would be addressed to the customer who just did the thing it asks for, while the person who needs to act on it did nothing. The new address is marked unverified and sent a confirmation link. Somebody reading an address out over the phone has not demonstrated they can receive mail at it, and that is the commonest way this goes wrong harmlessly. Complete in its effects. The move signs the customer out everywhere, removes every passkey, and cancels reset links already sent. That is the conclusion #42 reached for password reset, and it applies here with more force: somebody the system cannot identify asked for this change, so a session or a credential surviving it is one the new owner cannot see and cannot revoke, and a reset link sitting in the mailbox being taken away would let whoever still reads it take the account straight back. The password is left alone. What the customer lost was the mailbox, so demanding a new one adds a step for no gain. The verification-email helper moved out of the customers route into its own module, for the reason session creation moved out for passkeys: two implementations that agree today are two that can be changed one at a time, and the one that gets forgotten is whichever the manual testing does not exercise. This path runs perhaps once a year, so it is exactly the one that would rot. The admin drawer gains the action next to the address rather than among the account controls, because it is a thing done to that field by someone already looking at it. It leads with the warning instead of burying it. The history of moves sits on the same drawer and renders nothing at all for the overwhelming majority of customers, who have never been moved. Verified: backend tsc clean for src and tests, 526 unit tests pass, lint clean apart from warnings that predate this branch; frontend tsc, lint and build clean. The integration suite needs a database this machine has no Docker for. It also cannot be proven by CI right now — run 917 has been hung since it started and 24 runs are queued behind it, which is the same hang #154 identifies as the source of the leftover Postgres containers. Closes #337 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
synAdminandClaude Opus 5
|
88f76926d5 |
feat(passkeys): registration ceremony (#38)
A signed-in customer can register a passkey. Signing in with one is #39 and the management screen is #40, so nothing reads these credentials yet. The name column arrives here rather than in #37. That issue listed the columns the ceremony needs and this one is for the person: #40 shows a list and offers to revoke from it, and "phone" against "laptop" is the only thing that makes two rows tellable apart. Without it a customer revoking a credential is choosing between identical entries. The customer may name it, and otherwise it is derived from the authenticator's transports — a hint rather than a fact, so the defaults are deliberately vague. "This device" is honest about a platform authenticator in a way that guessing at a model name would not be. Single use is enforced by deleting the challenge and treating the delete as the check, in one statement with the expiry condition. A replayed response finds nothing to delete and is refused, and two requests racing cannot both see the row and both proceed. Beginning a second registration replaces any in-flight challenge for that customer, so pressing the button twice cannot leave the first one usable. The challenge is consumed before the response is verified, deliberately. A failed attempt must not leave one available for a second try, so an invalid response costs the ceremony rather than merely failing it. Never started, already used and expired all answer the same way. From the server they are one condition — no challenge this customer may still complete — and distinguishing them would tell someone guessing which guess was closest. excludeCredentials stops the same authenticator being enrolled twice, but it is a hint the browser may ignore, so the unique constraint on credential_id is what actually holds. Hitting it answers 409: the credential is already registered, which is not a failure of anything. userID is the customer id rather than the email. A userID is meant to be stable and opaque, and an email is neither — a customer changing theirs would otherwise look like a different person to their own authenticator. Discoverable credentials are requested as preferred rather than required, because #39 wants sign-in without the customer first saying who they are, and an authenticator that cannot store one should still be usable here. Mounted before /api/customers, like the addresses router: Express matches mounts in order and the broader prefix would otherwise swallow these. Verified: tsc clean for src and tests, lint 0 errors with no new warnings, 514 unit tests across 35 suites — twenty new, covering the naming rules. The schema mirror gains the name column, placed where kysely-codegen would put it. Not verified: neither migration has been run against a database, and the ceremony itself cannot be exercised without a browser and an authenticator. What CI can prove is that the routes exist, are wrapped, and refuse an unauthenticated caller; what it cannot prove is a real attestation, which needs a device. Closes #38 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
synAdminandClaude Opus 5
|
6d320fd867 |
feat(passkeys): schema, dependency and per-environment Relying Party (#37)
Groundwork only. Nothing reads any of this yet, and no behaviour changes. The Relying Party ID is derived from PUBLIC_URL rather than written down, because it is the one value in this feature that cannot be corrected afterwards: a credential is bound to it permanently, and a wrong one surfaces only as a customer unable to sign in with a passkey that no longer matches anything. PUBLIC_URL is what every customer-facing link is already built from, so the ID is correct wherever those links are, and wrong only where they were already wrong. hostname rather than host, so a port cannot reach an ID that must not contain one. Local development is the exception the issue's table did not cover. envValidation requires PUBLIC_URL only when SMTP is configured, so a local setup that cannot send mail legitimately has none and falls back to localhost, which browsers treat as a secure context. Two origins there rather than one: the app is served by Vite on 5173 during development and by Express on 3000 once built, and those differ only by port, which is not part of the RP ID. The challenge table is separate from customer_tokens, and the reason is structural rather than preference. customer_tokens.customer_id is NOT NULL, and an authentication challenge is issued before anyone is identified — a discoverable-credential sign-in has no customer to attach to at the moment the challenge exists. Storing it there would mean making that column nullable for every other kind of token. Two of the issue's open decisions are deliberately not made here, because they belong to the ceremony that enforces them rather than to the schema. What to do when the signature counter fails to increase is #39's: many synced passkeys report zero forever, so treating a non-increase as cloning is wrong for them and right for a hardware key, and this only has to hold the value. Whether a disabled account can authenticate is also #39's, and the schema takes the position that it should not cost the customer their devices: credentials survive disabling and are refused at the ceremony, so re-enabling does not mean re-registering everything. Deletion is different and is settled here — credentials cascade with the customer, since one outliving its owner could authenticate as an account that no longer exists. signature_counter is BIGINT because the spec allows a 32-bit unsigned value, which overflows a signed INTEGER at half its range. That is the first bigint column in this schema, so the generated mirror gains the Int8 alias with it. Both tables are added to resetDb's TRUNCATE list and to REQUIRED_TABLES, and the schema mirror is updated by hand to match what kysely-codegen emits — placement and all, so a real regenerate produces no diff. Skipping either is how #56 turned a green local run into a red main; the mirror drift guard exists precisely to catch it, and schemaLoss's count moves from 18 to 20 with them. Verified: tsc clean for src and tests, lint 0 errors with no new warnings, 494 unit tests across 34 suites including nine new ones for the RP derivation, frontend build green, and the migration parses. Not verified: the migration has not been run against a database, and the integration suite needs one this machine cannot provide. Worth knowing before this goes further: #313 changes the domain, and every passkey registered before that cutover stops working at it. This code needs no change — it follows PUBLIC_URL — but the credentials do not survive. That is free while production is not live and nobody holds one, and it stops being free the day the shop opens. Closes #37 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
synAdminandClaude Opus 5
|
955049eac9 |
fix(privacy): separate analytics consent from email consent (#56)
The previous commit widened the marketing consent sentence to cover the Brevo tracker, so one checkbox carried both purposes. That is the specific pattern GDPR rejects: consent has to be granular, and current EDPB guidance treats bundling tracking consent with subscription consent as invalid because the customer cannot accept one purpose and refuse the other. Quebec's Law 25 s.8.1 is stricter again — profiling technology has to be off until the person switches it on, with no pre-ticked box and no consent inherited from agreeing to something else. Building to both standards was the decision, since the storefront is publicly reachable and anyone can register. So the marketing sentence is restored to exactly what it was, which leaves every existing email consent valid and untouched, and analytics gets its own column, its own sentence, its own checkbox at registration, its own toggle in the account page and its own endpoint. A customer can now hold either, both, or neither, and withdrawing one does not disturb the other. The migration defaults analytics_consent to false, which is both the honest answer — none of the existing customers was ever asked — and what Law 25 requires. Nothing about this change opts anybody in. Two details that are compliance requirements rather than wording preferences. The sentence names Brevo instead of saying "our email provider", because informed consent means the customer can tell who receives their data and a description they cannot act on is not disclosure. And the account toggle is as prominent and as easy to switch off as it is to switch on, because withdrawal has to be as easy as consenting. The analytics endpoint is separate from the marketing one rather than a second field on it, so that a single call cannot change an answer the customer did not touch — the bundling problem moved from the form into the API. The unit tests now assert the two consents stay apart in both directions, including that the marketing sentence still says nothing about tracking, because re-bundling them would otherwise pass silently and is the mistake this project already made once. Verified: backend tsc clean, both lint suites 0 errors with no new warnings, 478 unit tests passing across 33 suites, frontend production build green. Not verified: the migration has not been run against a database, and integration and e2e need a Node this machine does not have active. None of this is legal advice and the wording is worth a lawyer's eye before it ships. Refs #56 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
 bermudalambandClaude Opus 5
|
eaecc43379 |
feat(intake): record where an upload link was sent, and how to say it (#260)
Adds upload_links.contact_email and the uploadLink mail template. The column is nullable on purpose. Links already exist in QA and a migration cannot invent addresses for them, so they are grandfathered rather than backfilled with something untrue; the requirement belongs in the create route, which is where new links are actually made. The template requires submitUrl, the same guard verification has on verifyUrl. An email inviting somebody to send in photos, with no way for them to do it, sends perfectly happily and looks fine in the log — it is the one failure here worth making impossible, and a test asserts the default body satisfies the guard it declares. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5
|
534e3d6228 |
feat(intake): record the background-removal intent and the original path (#281)
Adds the two columns the background-removal feature (#281) is built on: item_drafts.remove_background (boolean, not null, default true) records the submitter's per-submission intent, and item_images.original_image_path (nullable text, no default) records where a cut-out photo came from so it can be restored. The default on remove_background is load-bearing — any row written by a path that does not mention the column behaves like the new default, so no backfill is needed. original_image_path stays null until a photo has actually been cut out, which doubles as the answer to "can this be restored?" rather than needing a separate flag. Also updates the Drizzle mirror in src/db-drizzle/schema.ts by hand (the local dev database was not running to re-pull from) and adds the integration test backgroundRemoval.integration.test.ts, including the exported seedSubmission helper that Task 3 will reuse. Closes #281 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
bermudalamb
|
6df32af784 |
feat(intake): add upload_links and item_drafts, and default an item's price (#222)
The schema for the intake pipeline. A submission becomes an `items` row at status 'pending' — already invisible to every public and storefront query since #90 — with an `item_drafts` row beside it holding the submitter's note, which link it arrived through, and the fields the drafting worker will fill in later. `upload_links` stores a digest rather than a token, so a leaked database is not also a leaked set of working links, and the admin screen can show a token exactly once. `max_submissions` is nullable for "no cap", but the route will default it to a finite number: an unbounded link should be something asked for, not something that happens when nobody thought about it. `item_drafts.upload_link_id` is ON DELETE SET NULL rather than CASCADE. Deleting a link must not delete the items that arrived through it — provenance is lost, the goods are not. `items.price_cents` keeps NOT NULL and gains a default of 80.00, so an arriving item is always priced. That is the decision taken in the design review over making the column nullable: it costs the schema-level guarantee that nothing can publish at a price nobody chose, and buys not having to teach the cart, the checkout and thirteen other files about an item without a price. The protection moves into the review queue, and `price_source` exists so that queue can say whether a number came from a model, the default, or a person. The number lives in the migration rather than in configuration. Changing a default price is a rare, deliberate act that deserves a record; an environment variable would let it drift silently between environments, and a wrong default is invisible until something has already sold at it. Verified up, down and up again rather than only forwards — an irreversible migration is one that cannot be tested. Then verified by inspection rather than assumption: the default reads 8000, both tables and the state index exist, and an item inserted with no price comes back at 8000. Backend: 263 integration, 302 unit, all passing against the new schema. Ref #222 |
||
|
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5
|
b287c07747 |
feat: capture first and last name so emails can greet informally (#106)
Registration collected one optional Name, so every greeting had only a whole name to use: "Hi Thom Lamb," rather than "Hi Thom,". Both parts are now captured, and the cart reminder greets by first name. Both are required of anyone new, refused individually rather than as a single "name is required" so a form that filled one and not the other is told which. The columns are nullable even so, and that is deliberate. Marking them NOT NULL would mean backfilling legacy rows with empty strings, which asserts that every customer has a name — untrue of anyone who registered while the field was optional. The table records what is actually the case; the rule that new registrations must supply both lives in the route, where a missing field can produce a message naming it. The backfill splits on the first space, and it is lossy in a way no version of this avoids. "Thom Lamb" becomes Thom and Lamb; "Mary Jane Smith" gets a last name of "Jane Smith"; names that are not two parts fare worse. It was chosen over leaving the columns empty because nothing currently lets a customer correct their own name — PUT /api/customers/me exists but no frontend calls it — so empty would have meant permanently unpersonalised for every existing customer. The migration says so, so nobody later reads backfilled values as data the customer supplied in that shape. Verified against a seeded database rather than reasoned about, because this is the part that cannot be covered by the suite: migrations run in globalSetup before any test, and the old column is gone afterwards. Six representative rows through the real migration gave Thom/Lamb, Mary/"Jane Smith", Cher/null, " Padded Name " trimmed to Padded/Name, and null and whitespace-only names left as null on both. The down migration rejoins the parts and returns all six to their original strings. The old column is dropped rather than kept alongside, so there is one source of truth instead of two that drift. The admin keeps receiving a single composed display name. It only ever shows one — the list cell and the drawer title — and never edits one, so giving it both parts plus the joining logic would be work for no reader. Churn was the bulk of this: 14 backend registrations and 10 end-to-end registration forms. A first attempt at the backend fixtures also added names to login and password-reset payloads, which would still have passed since the server ignores unknown fields, but a login test implying login takes a name is a small lie; that was reverted and redone against register calls only. Verified: 172 unit, 183 integration and 95 end-to-end passing, lint unchanged at 4 backend and 27 frontend warnings. Not covered: the cart reminder itself, which runs from a cron and had no test before this either. The greeting change is a one-line substitution in that query. Refs #106 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5
|
ecc2219fa5 |
feat: stage new items as pending until an admin publishes them (#90)
An item used to be live on the storefront the instant it was created. Now it starts pending, and a customer sees it only once it is published. The migration changes the column default and nothing else. Backfilling would un-publish the entire live catalogue, which is the one thing it must not do. Hiding a pending item took four separate changes, not one, and that is the part worth knowing. The storefront's item routes had no status filter at all — sold items are listed and rendered with a Sold badge deliberately — so pending could not be expressed as one more optional filter. GET /api/items now carries an exclusion the caller cannot opt out of; GET /api/items/:id carries the same, because hiding an item from the list while still serving it by id would leave it reachable to anyone who kept a link; and GET /api/filters excludes pending from both aggregates it computes. That last one is the least obvious: a pending item would have inflated its tags' counts, so a customer would read "Rare (1)", filter by it, and be told nothing matches — and its price would have stretched the slider to a range no visible item occupies. The tag count is computed over the joined items rather than filtered with a WHERE. A WHERE would have dropped the row for a tag whose only item is pending, and the tag would have vanished from the drawer instead of showing zero. There is a test for exactly that, because the first version of this query had that bug. parseItemFilters is shared by the storefront and admin routes, so 'pending' parses on both. The public route refuses it explicitly rather than answering with an empty list, which would read as "no items match" instead of "you may not ask that". The storefront's URL reader is deliberately left not accepting it either, with a comment saying so, since a request guaranteed to fail is not worth constructing. Publishing is the existing mark-available: same transition, same UPDATE, so the admin UI labels that button "Publish" when the item is pending rather than adding a second endpoint that does the same thing. Unpublish is new and is not symmetrical — it is refused for a reserved item, which someone is holding in their cart right now, and for a sold one, which is a record of something that happened rather than a draft. Both refusals name their reason, and the buttons are hidden in those states so the refusal is not how you find out. Changing a column default has reach, and it surfaced eight test fixtures that silently depended on it. Each is now explicit about the status it wants rather than inheriting one — better practice regardless, and immune to the next default change. Two tests also used 'pending' as their example of an *unknown* status; both would have quietly become tautologies, so they now use one that is genuinely unknown. Verified: 98 unit, 160 integration and 94 end-to-end passing, the last on a freshly created container. One earlier run showed a single failure in favorites.spec.ts; it passes in isolation and on a clean container, and is the cross-spec interference already recorded against the suite rather than anything from this change. Refs #90 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5
|
f626f27e75 |
feat: favorite items and notify when a favorite is sold (#34)
Customers can favorite and unfavorite items from the storefront, opt in to being told when a favorite is sold to someone else, and manage that preference from their account page. The opt-in is a consent of its own rather than the existing marketing flag. Being told that a specific item you asked about has gone is a narrower thing than agreeing to marketing, and folding one into the other would leave marketing_consent_text no longer describing what was actually agreed to. It is recorded the same way as the marketing consent — flag, timestamp, and the exact wording shown — and accepting it does not set marketing_consent. The prompt appears only after a customer has actually favorited something, so the reason for asking is concrete rather than an abstract marketing ask, and it says plainly that it is separate from marketing email. Declining keeps the favorite. Notifications fire when an item reaches sold, either through checkout or an admin marking it sold, and never to the buyer — telling someone the item they just bought is unavailable reads as a bug. Reserved is deliberately not a trigger: reservations expire and get released, so a "gone" email would often be about an item still for sale. Disabled accounts are excluded, per #33. completeCheckout now returns the sold item ids and the buyer so its three call sites can notify after COMMIT. Sending inside the transaction would email people about a sale that then rolled back, and would hold the transaction open for SMTP. Each message is sent independently so one bad address cannot stop the rest, and the sale has already succeeded regardless. Favoriting while signed out opens the existing inline register/login modal, exactly as Add to Cart does, and completes the favorite on success. Also fixes a latent bug in the same component: while the session was still resolving, `customer` is null for a signed-in visitor too, so clicking Add to Cart or the new heart in that window prompted them to sign in again. Both now ignore clicks until the session has resolved, and the control shows as loading meanwhile. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5
|
13c010ff51 |
feat(admin): disable and re-enable customer accounts (#33)
Adds customers.disabled_at, admin disable/enable endpoints, a Status column and toggle on the Customers tab, and enforcement across every path that authenticates. Enforcement lives in attachCustomer, which previously validated only the session token and its expiry and never read the customer row. Register, login and password reset all mint sessions, so a single check in the middleware covers every path rather than three separate ones — and it means an existing rd_session cookie stops working at once instead of at its 30-day expiry. Disabling also deletes the sessions outright, so eviction does not wait for the next request. Disabling releases the items the customer was holding, in the same transaction. A disabled account cannot check out, so leaving its reservations would keep one-of-a-kind stock off the storefront for up to the cart expiry window for no purpose. Guarded on 'reserved' so a sold item is never resurrected. Re-enabling restores sign-in but does not give the items back — they may since have sold. Sign-in returns an explicit 403 rather than a generic credential failure. That does confirm the address has an account, which sits awkwardly beside the deliberately non-enumerating reset in #32; the trade was made the other way because a disabled customer told "invalid email or password" resets their password, succeeds, is still locked out, and concludes the site is broken. The check runs only after the password verifies, so it is not a bulk membership oracle, and /register already reveals existence. A reset token issued before the disable no longer mints a session, and no new tokens are issued for a disabled account — while still answering 200, so that endpoint stays non-enumerating. Self-service GDPR export and deletion are blocked along with everything else, so those requests now need servicing by hand. Worth checking the privacy policy does not promise unconditional self-service. Also fixes an unrelated bug the e2e run surfaced: the admin inventory fired a request per keystroke in the price fields with no sequencing, so an older response could land after a newer one and repaint stale rows. Only the most recently issued request may now set state. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
bermudalambandClaude Opus 5
|
9222e97deb |
feat(api): categories, tags, and storefront item filters (#23)
Adds a self-referencing categories tree, a tag registry with deterministic colours, and item_tags, plus admin CRUD for both. GET /api/items now accepts category, tags, min_price and max_price. Category matching walks the subtree with a recursive CTE so selecting a parent includes everything filed beneath it; tags match with AND via a count check, since ANY() alone would return items carrying only one of them. Malformed filter params return 400 rather than being ignored, so a broken link doesn't quietly list the whole catalogue. GET /api/filters serves the drawer its tree, tags, and price bounds in one request. Item image/tag aggregation moves from LEFT JOIN + GROUP BY to scalar subqueries. Joining two one-to-many relations multiplies their rows, so an item with 2 images and 3 tags would have repeated every image three times once tags were added. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
bermudalamb
|
7f4479605a | chore: replace manual SQL migrations with node-pg-migrate |