diff --git a/backend/src/emailTemplates.ts b/backend/src/emailTemplates.ts
index 60c1a8c..68594d0 100644
--- a/backend/src/emailTemplates.ts
+++ b/backend/src/emailTemplates.ts
@@ -281,7 +281,10 @@ export const SAMPLE_VALUES: Record<string, string> = {
   regenerateUrl: 'https://example.com/api/intake-actions/1/regenerate?expires=0&sig=sample',
   discardUrl: 'https://example.com/api/intake-actions/1/discard?expires=0&sig=sample',
   expiresIn: 'one hour',
-  holdDuration: '24 hours'
+  holdDuration: '24 hours',
+  submitUrl: 'https://example.com/submit/sample-token',
+  label: 'Autumn drop-off',
+  submissionsAllowed: '25 items'
 };
 
 export interface StoredTemplate {
diff --git a/backend/tests/unit/emailTemplates.test.ts b/backend/tests/unit/emailTemplates.test.ts
index 302c533..0d9935a 100644
--- a/backend/tests/unit/emailTemplates.test.ts
+++ b/backend/tests/unit/emailTemplates.test.ts
@@ -8,14 +8,11 @@ import {
   SAMPLE_VALUES
 } from '../../src/emailTemplates';
 
-const KEYS: TemplateKey[] = [
-  'verification',
-  'passwordReset',
-  'favoriteSold',
-  'favoriteWithdrawn',
-  'cartReminder',
-  'emailChanged'
-];
+// Derived from TEMPLATES rather than hardcoded, so a new template is covered
+// by every it.each below the moment it is added. A hardcoded list silently
+// stops covering anything added after it was written — which is exactly how
+// intakeDraft and uploadLink went untested by the SAMPLE_VALUES guard below.
+const KEYS = Object.keys(TEMPLATES) as TemplateKey[];
 
 describe('the built-in templates', () => {
   it.each(KEYS)('%s has a default subject and body', (key) => {
@@ -268,7 +265,22 @@ describe('greeting, built from the configured format', () => {
 });
 
 describe('every template can address the customer', () => {
-  it.each(KEYS)('%s offers greeting, firstName and lastName', (key) => {
+  // Not KEYS: this is an invariant of the six customer-facing templates only.
+  // intakeDraft and uploadLink notify the shop and a contributor respectively,
+  // not a customer with a name on file, so they are deliberately not held to
+  // it — a hardcoded list is correct here rather than a staleness risk,
+  // because the set of templates this claim applies to does not grow just
+  // because TEMPLATES does.
+  const CUSTOMER_FACING_KEYS: TemplateKey[] = [
+    'verification',
+    'passwordReset',
+    'favoriteSold',
+    'favoriteWithdrawn',
+    'cartReminder',
+    'emailChanged'
+  ];
+
+  it.each(CUSTOMER_FACING_KEYS)('%s offers greeting, firstName and lastName', (key) => {
     expect(TEMPLATES[key].available).toEqual(
       expect.arrayContaining(['greeting', 'firstName', 'lastName'])
     );